SMSF Off-the-Plan Purchase Gone Wrong
What happens when an SMSF can't secure funding at settlement and members transfer the property to personal names without returning the deposit?
The Situation
An SMSF in Queensland paid a deposit for an off-the-plan property purchase. As settlement approached, they couldn't secure funding. Instead of losing the deposit, the members transferred the property into their personal names and completed the purchase with bank finance—but didn't return the deposit to the SMSF because they didn't have the funds.
The Problem
Key Compliance Issue: Did the SMSF provide a benefit to the members by effectively loaning them money? This could breach SIS 65.1.b—no loans or financial assistance to members!
Consequences
- Auditor likely to lodge contravention report with ATO
- Deposit must be repaid (unless members meet condition of release)
- Interest may be owed on the deposit amount
- ATO could impose penalties if breach not fixed
The Right Way
If the deposit had been repaid to the SMSF when the contract was transferred to personal names, there wouldn't be an issue. The ATO doesn't penalise funds for failing to obtain finance for settlement, as long as everything else is handled correctly.
Key Lesson: Always ensure SMSF funds are returned immediately if a transaction doesn't proceed through the SMSF. Failing to do so can result in serious compliance breaches and ATO penalties.